Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bob Bedford's avatar

So this is certainly super interesting, and well written. I guess I would say that you've limited it to the last 24 years, where's expanding it to include more history might be more enlightening.

I don't know if you're aware of the Foundation for Cycles Research - but would strongly recommend checking them out.

Generally the idea:

- there's an ~18 year real estate cycle (goes back several hundred years), and we are rapidly approaching that

- there's some very long cycles in interest rates of 40-60 years, with the general idea that we're entering a secular bear market for bonds

- a 3.5 year cycle for risk markets

Plenty of others. But you're definitely onto something here.

I'd challenge the idea that energy can't perform - because I think that's rooted in the environment we've been in since the end of the last commodities super cycle. Put differently, I see strong analogies to today being equivalent to January 1973 - in which case it could be energy and bonds that push us over the edge to the next down cycle.

Expand full comment
Ulysses Awsumb's avatar

Thank you very much!

I'll check out The Foundation of Cycles research, haven't seen it yet.

Also, I agree energy can perform, or better than it is. To what degree is measurable to any other was my point. My latest EFFing memo covers the updated weekly natural gas cycle as well.

Thank you for the conversation and suggestions.

Expand full comment

No posts